It should be OK if author is missing. I have tools that does validation and moreover it has zero or one occurrence on the spec. http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#the-author-element-and-its-attributes -- Gorkem
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: > I think it should be necessary but we never got that far in terms of > validating config.xml or anything like that > > On 7/16/13 8:38 AM, "Jeffrey Heifetz" <jheif...@blackberry.com> wrote: > > >When the config.xml for mobile-spec was re-written recently the <author> > >element was removed and I'm just wondering if this is valid. In the > >BlackBerry implementation we've always required one and I'm wondering if > >this behaviour is wrong, or if I should add one to mobile-spec. > > > >Thanks, > > > >Jeff > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > >information, privileged material (including material protected by the > >solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute > >non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than > >the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this > >transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete > >this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or > >reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not > >authorized and may be unlawful. > >
