On Jul 17, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > Wherein we treat 3.10 and 3.11 as actual hardening not 'one more > thing' hardening. This pushes our release to the fall which is > typically better for conference season. Essentially the same as we > have it today excepting that we acknowledge the summer releases as bug > fixing only. Thoughts?
Additionally, what would you think about treating the *.1 releases (i.e., 3.1, 4.1) as actual hardening also? Or alternatively make the *.0 releases have a duration of 2 months (1 for feature add, 1 for hardening)? For example, the CLI in 3.0, for all its coolness, feels like it needs a bit more time to shake out bugs / settle. Doing significant feature add and shakeout in 1 month feels a bit rushed.
