Still bumping around in legal. Sorry for the delay everyone.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > Awesome! Apache is the way to go! > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > >> Word on the legal list is that yes this is possible. Just finding out >> whom has the keys (or if they even exist yet) for the Apple Developer >> account for the ASF. >> >> Even though we *just* shipped 3 I have to say I'm really excited for >> this capability for the development flow. =) >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > +1 for Apache handling it first, if possible. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> >> Ya ppl are going to freak out for this functionality. =) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> > I haven't actually played with this yet. I think this would make an >> >> > awesome blog post. Found an old note that says "record a video to >> show >> >> off >> >> > the app-harness". I still think thats a good idea. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> I'll ping the legal list to see what the process is for deploying to >> >> >> proprietary channels. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Simon MacDonald >> >> >> <simon.macdon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > I think it makes sense for Apache to own it in the app store. It >> also >> >> >> > leaves groups like Adobe, Google, etc. the opportunity to drop >> their >> >> >> > own versions of the app-harness with additional proprietary >> >> >> > functionality. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Simon Mac Donald >> >> >> > http://hi.im/simonmacdonald >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Lorin Beer < >> >> lorin.beer....@gmail.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I agree with your breakdown of options in order of sanity, Braden >> :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Ideally this should be owned by the organization that owns the >> code: >> >> the >> >> >> >> Apache Cordova Project. While an acceptable second would be for >> the >> >> >> Adobe >> >> >> >> Cordova Team to publish it, I think there is a precedent for an >> >> Apache >> >> >> >> project owning and managing an appstore account. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Apache OpenOffice is made available through the mac appstore. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Lorin >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Braden Shepherdson < >> >> >> bra...@chromium.org>wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> So we've got a working app harness in the cordova-app-harness >> repo. >> >> >> One of >> >> >> >>> the founding goals for the app harness was that it could be >> placed >> >> >> into the >> >> >> >>> Play Store and App Store. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Then the question is: who owns the apps in the various markets? >> It >> >> >> seems to >> >> >> >>> me that there are four possibilities: >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> 1. Apache Cordova project (Can we do that under Apache's rules? >> >> Apple's >> >> >> >>> rules? Is there precedent at Apache for App Store accounts and >> >> such?) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> 2. Adobe PhoneGap team >> >> >> >>> 3. Google Cordova/Mobile Chrome Apps team >> >> >> >>> (4. Some individual person from one of the above, separately from >> >> the >> >> >> >>> larger organization.) >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> These are in descending order of how sane I think they are. If >> it's >> >> >> >>> possible for the Apache project to control the AppStore accounts, >> >> that >> >> >> >>> would be best. If not, the PhoneGap team is probably the best >> way to >> >> >> go. >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Thoughts? >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >>> Braden >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
