Well, that means 2.9.1 then. I think its ok to push a tag that we can point users to but not push an actual ./dist release.
Thoughts? On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > No, plugman remove/install is not supported on windows phone until 3.0.0 > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > > On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The core plugins weren't installed with plugman, so they would have to >> be deleted manually. Kind of a raw deal here. >> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote: >> > I don't think that affects plugman >> > >> > On 7/30/13 4:23 PM, "Brian LeRoux" <b...@brian.io> wrote: >> > >> >>Does plugman remove / install work here? If so, I think that would be >> >>preferred way. >> >> >> >>On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hey >> >>> >> >>> Apparently Cordova 2.9.x doesn't build with Android 4.3. This is >> >>> because of an issue with setPluginsEnabled being deprecated in >> >>> InAppBrowser. Since we agreed to support this release, should we >> >>> release a Cordova 2.9.1 soon to incorporate the fix, or just tell >> >>> people to replace InAppBrowser with the plugin version? >> >>> >> >>> Thoughts? >> >>> >> >>> Joe >> > >>
