Only used the framework attribute name because of the clear link with the
<framework> tag behaviour. Not opposed to changing it for clarity, for sure


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>wrote:

> I suppose this is fine. I think a logical alternative would be to use <src>
> and have plugman know that .a means add it to your linker flags. It's not a
> framework (since it doesn't have a .framework extension), so the name is a
> bit confusing.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm the culprit behind the request for source-file framework=true :)
> >
> > This was started in the pre-3.0.0 days, and is still a concern in 3.0.0.
> > For example look at this plugin:
> > https://github.com/shazron/TestFlightPlugin/blob/master/plugin.xml
> >
> > The libTestFlight.a file is a file that needs to be copied over
> > (<source-file>), and also installed in the "Link Binary with Libraries"
> > section (<framework>. It cannot be added as just a <framework> because
> that
> > just adds it to "Link Binary with Libraries" (this is mainly for System
> > frameworks, e.g CoreMedia.framework).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > #1 <lib-file> == dynamically linked libs that exist in your plugin ==
> > .so,
> > > .dll, .dylib, .jar
> > > #2 <framework> == dynamically linked libs provided by the OS == .so,
> > .dll,
> > > .dylib, .framework
> > > #3 <src> == precompiled object file / lib that exists in you plugins ==
> > .a,
> > > .o
> > > #4 <src framework="true"> == ???... Might refer to the fake .framework
> > > files that some iOS projects distribute (that have .a in them instead
> of
> > > .dylib). Example might just be wrong (should say .framework not .a)
> > >
> > > so... I think all four do different things, but maybe we can coalesce
> > them
> > > better?
> > >
> > > e.g. we could have have framework=true be unnecessary by just looking
> at
> > > the file extension.
> > > Not sure about a sane way to combine the others... Maybe add a section
> to
> > > the docs that highlights the differences?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I would think it will be more confusing to use the same tag name that
> > > does
> > > > something different depending on which platform its used on, so I'de
> > vote
> > > > to leave them specific and not try to unify.
> > > >
> > > > I do think thats its hard to tell which tag applies to which
> platform,
> > so
> > > > perhaps a platform prefix or platform attribute that is verified by a
> > > > schema (ie, <framework platform=ios ...>, <lib-file platform=bb10
> ...>)
> > > >
> > > > Not sure about the sourrce-file framework=true issue, but that sounds
> > > > confusing :)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Filip Maj <f...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > There's an issue filed for plugman [1], wherein a user had an issue
> > > > > authoring a plugin.xml file for a plugin and got tripped up with
> > > > > <framework> [2] and <lib-file> [3] support on different platforms.
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently: <framework> only applies to iOS. <lib-file> only for
> BB10.
> > > To
> > > > > confuse matters further, we also support <source-file> elements
> with
> > a
> > > > > framework=true attribute (that is iOS-only).
> > > > >
> > > > > :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Any ideas on how to consolidate all this stuff? How to make this
> > > > > specification clearer/more readable/more intuitive?
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4430
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/3.0.0/plugin_ref_spec.md.html#Plugin%20Sp
> > > > > ecification_framework
> > > > > [3]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/3.0.0/plugin_ref_spec.md.html#Plugin%20Sp
> > > > > ecification_lib_file
> > > > > [4]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/3.0.0/plugin_ref_spec.md.html#Plugin%20Sp
> > > > > ecification_source_file
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to