The roadmap for WebWorks SDK is to use Apache Cordova as its base.
We have modified those files to comply with cordova spec, utilizing name
rather than id.
As a cordova developer, you only need the native tools on your path. These
can come from either the WebWorks SDK or the Native SDK.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks Bryan
>
> I think I understand now most of the node js script in cordova are also
> present in webworks sdk
>
> 1. I think cordova should create a valid config.xml to be use by
> blackberry10 platform.
> 2. We should use updated code to validate that config.xml is a valid file
> even with user additions
> 3. Since we required the sdk anyway why have an old copy of the same files
> in cordova and not leverage the ones present in sdk?
>
> config-parser.js in cordova is different in than webworks config.parser.js
>
> function createAccessListObj(uri, allowSubDomain) {
> return {
> uri: uri,
> allowSubDomain: allowSubDomain
> };
> }
>
> vs in webworks
> function createAccessListObj(featuresArray, uri, allowSubDomain) {
> return {
> features: featuresArray,
> uri: uri,
> allowSubDomain: allowSubDomain
> };
> }
>
> resulting in different validations in function
> config-parser.js: function validateConfig(widgetConfig)
> if (access.features) {
> // Assert each feature has a proper ID and is not empty
> access.features.forEach(function (feature) {
> if (!feature) {
> throw
> localize.translate("EXCEPTION_INVALID_FEATURE_ID");
> }
> check(feature.id,
> localize.translate("EXCEPTION_INVALID_FEATURE_ID")).notNull().notEmpty();
> });
> }
>
> Should I filed a bug to add <feature "id" ..> to all cordova plugins and
> update config-parser.js in cordova?
>
> --Carlos
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Bryan Higgins <br...@bryanhiggins.net
> >wrote:
>
> > The tools are not compatible. In fact, most of the source from bbwp has
> > been contributed into Cordova.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I see that cordova 3.x uses blackberry-nativepackager instead of bbwp
> > >
> > > Any known problems with using bbwp?
> > > Is bbwp not supported as a method to package a Cordova App?
> > >
> > > When using bbwp on an App created with Cordova 3 it errors on
> validation
> > > config.xml
> > >
> > > <feature> tag missing attribute "id"
> > >
> > > <feature name="Camera" value="Camera" />
> > >
> > > adding "id" makes validation pass
> > >
> > > <feature id="Camera" name="Camera" value="Camera" />
> > >
> > > Shouldn't according to BB docs feature only contain "id" and nothign
> > else?
> > >
> > > like this
> > >
> > > <feature id="Camera" />
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://developer.blackberry.com/html5/documentation/feature_element_834678_11.html
> > >
> > > Syntax
> > > <feature id="string"
> > > required=["true" | "false"]
> > > version="string" />
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Santana
> > > <csantan...@gmail.com>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Santana
> <csantan...@gmail.com>
>
