Plugins are not tagged nor branched along with platforms. They are releases completely independently.
Commit to the "dev" branch always. For how to do a plugin release (aka merge dev into master, see https://wiki.apache.org/cordova/StepsForPluginRelease). Anis just added a branch for pushing them to the cordova registry, where the only difference is removing the url= attribute from <dependency> tags. That step should be added to the release page. On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I have a small change for Windows 8 that I need to apply to all the core > plugins. > Which branch should I work from, and which should I push to? > > @purplecabbage > risingj.com > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, what are the plugins being versioned at? 3.x? 1.x? > > > > I'm asking because the plugins are tagged with the 3.0.0 release, so > > it makes sense for them to start there. > > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org > > > > wrote: > > > I don't think we want the Cordova version (3.1.0) getting tagged in > > > plugins. I should think we should merge dev to master and then tag it > > with > > > the plugin's own version number, not Cordova versions. Put another way, > > > it's only a coincidence that this plugin release happens to be near the > > > Cordova 3.1.0 release. > > > > > > Braden > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Jira issue is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4889 > > >> > > >> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > This is what I've done. Hopefully I didn't mess up because I haven't > > >> > really followed the master/dev debate. > > >> > > > >> > For each plugin: > > >> > - I created a branch and named it 3.1.0 > > >> > - I pulled from origin dev > > >> > - I renamed the id from org.apache.cordova.core.* to > > org.apache.cordova.* > > >> > - I renamed the version from x.x.xdev to x.x.x > > >> > - I changed the dependency from URL to id where applicable (I > believe > > >> > it was only file-transfer and media-capture) > > >> > - I published the plugin to the registry > > >> > - I unpublished the old plugin from the registry. > > >> > > > >> > The docs were actually already reflecting IDs without 'core' in them > > >> > so I didn't update them. > > >> > > > >> > The process (once we figure out what to do about those 3.0.0 users) > > >> > should be in the future. > > >> > - Work on master > > >> > - Tag version > > >> > - Publish that version > > >> > > > >> > I left master untouched for all plugins so 3.0.0 users should not > have > > >> > any issues. > > >> > > > >> > -a > > >> > > > >> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Andrew Grieve < > agri...@chromium.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> Sorry for being silent today. I ended up not having much time to > work > > >> today > > >> >> :(. Mostly what I got done is more thinking about how to go about > > >> things :P. > > >> >> > > >> >> That said, Braden did manage to take care of RC1 of CLI! Thanks > > Braden! > > >> ( > > >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4837). To get it: > > >> >> > > >> >> npm install -g cordova@3.0.10 > > >> >> > > >> >> With the RC, doing a "cordova platform add" will add the rc1 > > platform, > > >> and > > >> >> doing a "cordova platform update" will update an existing platform > to > > >> rc1. > > >> >> > > >> >> I think we should hold off on a blog post for it until we update > the > > >> >> plugins in the registry (and at the same time remove the .core > > part). If > > >> >> someone else wants to take that on, that'd be awesome. Otherwise I > > will > > >> get > > >> >> to it on Sunday while I'm in Amsterdam :). > > >> >> > > >> >> One revelation I had about the registry: > > >> >> I think we should *not* remove the url= line from FileTransfer's > > >> >> <dependency> tag for a little while. This will mean that even when > > >> >> FileTransfer comes from the registry, its dependency will come > > straight > > >> >> from the URL. The copy in the registry and the copy in git are the > > >> same, so > > >> >> this should be fine. If we *did* remove the url right away, then > > people > > >> >> using the 3.0 tools and following the 3.0 instructions would break. > > >> >> > > >> >> New New timeline: > > >> >> ASAP - Upload rc1 of cordova-docs > > >> >> Sunday/Monday - Plugin release + Uploading plugins to registry > > >> >> Monday - Blog post announcing RC1 > > >> >> Rest of week: Test upgrade process, Test the registry out, Make > sure > > >> docs > > >> >> are good, Test download tracking of the registry > > >> >> Following Monday (ish): Final Release > > >> >> > > >> >> In this revision, I push back the final release even more because I > > >> realize > > >> >> many of us will be travelling back from AMS. > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Ryan Stewart <rstew...@adobe.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >>> Ahh, thanks for the info. Any ETA on the updated plugins? > > >> >>> > > >> >>> =Ryan > > >> >>> > > >> >>> On 9/20/13 1:46 PM, "Michal Mocny" <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > > >> >>> > > >> >>> >I think Braden is supposed to get an RC of the cli out today. > I'm > > >> told > > >> >>> >this this may not included updated plugins yet until later, > though. > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> >On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Ryan Stewart < > rstew...@adobe.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> >> Is the RC still on track to get tagged today? > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> I'm working on the PhoneGap-CLI and want to also release an RC > > >> version > > >> >>> >>of > > >> >>> >> that when you guys have tagged. > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> =Ryan > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> On 9/20/13 1:01 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> >I think since it has taken longer than expected to get the RC > > >> tagged, > > >> >>> >>the > > >> >>> >> >final release has been push till thursday to allow more time > to > > >> test. > > >> >>> >>Is > > >> >>> >> >this correct? > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> >On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Marcel Kinard < > > >> cmarc...@gmail.com> > > >> >>> >> >wrote: > > >> >>> >> > > > >> >>> >> >> I'm confused about the date for 3.1.0 final release. These > two > > >> posts > > >> >>> >> >>don't > > >> >>> >> >> match. > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> On Sep 19, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Andrew Grieve < > > >> agri...@chromium.org> > > >> >>> >> >>wrote: > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > Next Thursday: > > >> >>> >> >> > - If everything seems fine with RC1, release 3.1.0 final. > > >> >>> >> >> > > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> On Sep 10, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Andrew Grieve < > > agri...@chromium.org > > >> > > > >> >>> >> wrote: > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > Monday 16th - Create release branches & tag RC of all > repos > > >> >>> >> >> > Tuesday 17th - Draft Release Blog Post (digest of > > changelogs) > > >> >>> >> >> > Monday 20th - Tag 3.1.0 for all repos > > >> >>> >> >> > Tuesday 21st - Push 3.1.0-1.0.0 of CLI to npm & Post blog > > post > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> >> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> > > >
