Tough call. I think there are pros/cons either way.
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > I noticed that cordova-docs wasn't tagged or branched at the same time the > platforms were branched into 3.1.x for rc1. This seems to leave open the > possibility for docs from platforms/plugins master (post 3.1.0) to leak > into the 3.1.0 docs. I realize that cordova-docs won't get branched because > of its internal directory structure, but I'm wondering if in the future it > would be wise to go ahead and do the equivalent of running "rake > version[3.1.0]" at the time that the 3.1.x branch is created. Then during > the rc period, docs would behave just like platforms where changes would > need to be put on 2 branches [master and 3.1.x] / doc versions [edge and > 3.1.x]. > > Thoughts? > > On Oct 1, 2013, at 12:05 AM, Marcel Kinard <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I believe the docs are now done. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4962 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4963 > > > > The only thing left to do is to change the pointer to use this new > version. > > > > On Sep 30, 2013, at 4:43 PM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Marcel - one big thing that hasn't happened yet is docs. > >
