the branch for both CLI and Plugman is called cordova-3.1.x (don't know why we didn't call it 3.1.x instead)
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jeffrey Heifetz <jheif...@blackberry.com>wrote: > It seems as though there is no cordova-cli 3.1.x branch, does this mean we > always release off of master? > > There is a bug I found where element tree needs to be bumped to the same > version as plugman to support namespace xml elements and I'd like to know > where to push this. > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > On 13-10-01 12:17 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Firefoxos is broken on master after the refactor. It works fine on the > >cordova-3.1.x branch though. > > > >I am testing jesse's pull requests for CLI + plugman today for > >cordova-3.1.x branch. If they look good I will merge them in. We should > >release CLI + Plugman at the same time as 3.1.0. The release should be > >based off cordova-3.1.x branch and not master. > >On Oct 1, 2013 7:41 AM, "Andrew Grieve" <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > >> Braden's out doing intern interviews yesterday & today, so it's unlikely > >> he'll see this email until tomorrow if not Thursday. > >> > >> We could still do a tools release, but just don't update the > >>platforms.js > >> file to point at 3.1.0. That said, I think I saw Firefox was broken on > >> HEAD? Think we'll want to fix that before doing so. > >> > >> In terms of testing the RC - as Steven said - using cordova@3.0.10 > >>should > >> do the trick > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > I have an open pull request I would like someone else to look at. [1] > >> > This addresses the issue that Carlos brought up during plugin remove > >>[2] > >> > It would be great if this could be part of the release, or at least > >>the > >> > commit cherry picked into it. > >> > > >> > Cheers, > >> > Jesse > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] > >> > https://github.com/purplecabbage/cordova-plugman/pull/2 > >> > [2] > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-4943 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > @purplecabbage > >> > risingj.com > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > I believe Braden did the same type of release for plugman that he > >>did > >> for > >> > > cordova cli. He updated both packages on npm but set the latest tag > >>to > >> > > point to the previous version until we were ready to do our full > >> release. > >> > > > >> > > If you install the CLI RC > >> > > sudo npm install -g cordova@3.0.10, you actually get version 0.12.0 > >>of > >> > > plugman as a dependency. > >> > > > >> > > I will wait for Braden to chime in. I figure the CLI and Plugman > >>should > >> > > both be released on the same day we release 3.1.0. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:39 PM, David Kemp <drk...@google.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 to a plugman npm release. > >> > > > > >> > > > David Kemp > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Steven Gill > >><stevengil...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Anyone see any issue with me doing a npm plugman release today? > >> > Testing > >> > > > the > >> > > > > CLI RC is kind of weird when the plugman dependency is > >> incompatible. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > -Steve > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential > information, privileged material (including material protected by the > solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public > information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended > recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, > please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from > your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this > transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. > >