Yes, it was a "for example" hypothetical. Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Senior Technology Evangelist Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation
On 19 February 2014 09:11, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ross Gardler > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > In all cases only PMC votes are binding, although it is good community > > > practice to acknowledge all votes. So, for example, if there are 2 > > binding > > > -1's, one non-binding -1 and 3 binding +1's an RM can choose to ignore > or > > > support the non-binding one as she feels is appropriate (if -1's are > > > ignored a justification for doing so goes a long way). > > > > > > > I only see one binding -1. Can you tell me who the other binding -1 is? > > > > I think that was phrased as a hypothetical: "...for example, if there > are..." >
