(I was wrong about firefoxos, its just cli thats missing the tag)
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> wrote: > C'mon Joe, its our job to help him. You can take the high road and then > Sebb can start affording us the same courtesy. > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Seriously, you can't find that yourself? You clearly know nothing > > about this project. > > > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 7:30 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 20 February 2014 14:47, Andrew Grieve <agri...@chromium.org> wrote: > > >> SCM == ? > > > > > > Source Code / Software Configuration Management > > > > > >> Do you mean the git tags? > > >> All of the repositories are tagged with the version number of the > > release. > > >> So, "3.4.0" is the tag. > > > > > > OK, so where are the repos then please? > > > Also, if the tag is not immutable, it would help to have the hash. > > > > > >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 9:02 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> On 18 February 2014 23:26, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >>> > Please review and vote on the Cordova 3.4.0 release. > > >>> > > > >>> > You can find the sample release at > http://people.apache.org/~steven/ > > >>> > > >>> At the risk of being flamed, I am concerned that the VOTE mail does > > >>> not include a link to the SCM tag. > > >>> > > >>> Why is this important? > > >>> > > >>> The ASF releases source files which come with a LICENSE (and NOTICE). > > >>> It is vital that the release only contains files that are permitted > to > > >>> be distributed, and we aren't accidentally including files that > should > > >>> not be distributed. > > >>> > > >>> Equally, it is important that the source release is not missing any > > >>> required files. > > >>> > > >>> The only practical way to check all the files is to compare the > source > > >>> archive against the tag(s) it is supposed to contain. > > >>> > > >>> In theory, an automated build process will ensure that the archive > > >>> only contains files from the tag, and does not omit any require > files. > > >>> However, in practice, the archives are built from workspaces that > > >>> contain other files (e.g. compilation output). > > >>> I know of at least two projects which used standard automated > > >>> procedures (Maven), yet their source releases contained files that > > >>> should not have been released. > > >>> > > >>> Should there be a complaint, it's important that the PMC can show > that > > >>> due diligence was done in checking the source archive contents. > > >>> This will be easier to prove if the VOTE thread contains details of > > >>> the SCM tags from which the archive was built. > > >>> > > >>> The SCM repo provides traceability of provenance. > > >>> > > >>> So please can someone provide the SCM tag(s) that were used to create > > >>> the source release? > > >>> > > >>> > Voting will go on for 24 hours. > > >>> > > > >>> > Cheers, > > >>> > > > >>> > -Steve > > >>> > > >
