Before I even try to grok the other questions, why can't we just tag iOS as 3.4.1?
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote: > Okay, I just chatted with Shaz. > > Since this is urgent, this is what we are thinking. > * Shaz tags iOS 3.5.0 (Monday) > * CLI cadence version will stay 3.4.0 but semver version will have a major > bump. I know we have talked about removing the cadence version, but I'd > like to give more notice to other tools who may be relying on that. > * CLI will point to 3.5.0 for iOS > * Tools release goes out Monday/Tuesday. This includes the plugman fix FFOS > desperately needs. > * Not touching docs for now > > * Cordova JS is a big question mark. > > If we build from master, the current build label inside the js will be > "3.5.0-dev-607ca9d". This does include the sha, so if we decide to tag it > 3.5.0 later, the sha will still be able to represent the commit for the JS > when iOS was tagged. > > BIG QUESTION: If we change the version to 3.5.0 from 3.5.0-dev, should we > tag the js? When other platforms are ready to tag, do we retag? do we tag > 3.5.1? > > The best course of action for the future is to set the build label in > cordovajs to be just the sha. > > For now, I propose we just use cordova-js on master (aka > 3.5.0-dev-607ca9d). We can work on modifying the build number to just the > sha for the next release. > > > In regards to tools, I am ready to initiate a vote thread for the tools > now. All the tests are passing and I have merged in some pull requests. I > don't think it makes a lot of sense to do it though if we are planning on > doing another one at the start of next week. So I will hold off until then. > If people have pull requests they want to get into the tools release for > next week, let me know. > > Once Apachecon is over (maybe even at Apachecon), I will start implementing > some of work we have been discussing the last couple of weeks about > releasing. Andrew wrote up a great proposal of next steps at > http://markmail.org/message/76cfn4tbboqfcwxy. > > -Steve > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Urgent as in -- ppl using Xcode 5.1 can't compile without mucking about a > > lot in project settings, and I mean a lot of settings. And even then they > > might not get it right. But the more urgent issue is, on 64-bit > platforms, > > the current iOS code will crash because of the requirement of explicit > > casting of their low-level message sending functions. > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Since we haven't decided on whether to break out platforms, we should > > > probably attempt to continue with the release cadence. How urgent is > > > the iOS update? Could it be a 3.4.x release on its own? > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Andrew Grieve <agri...@google.com> > > > wrote: > > > > I don't think I'll have time before ApacheCon to help with this. > Would > > be > > > > happy if it happened, but can't contribute myself. Things should > clear > > up > > > > for me post ApacheCon though, and I'll start getting back at things. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Should we start this now? On iOS it's painful for regular devs who > > need > > > to > > > >> keep patching things. We should get it out at least before > ApacheCon I > > > >> hope. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 7:32 PM, Andrew Grieve < > agri...@chromium.org> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > That's all it does right now, but I always figured we could use it > > to > > > >> patch > > > >> > other things that aren't so hard to do. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:04 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > I'm all for 3.5.0 release. > > > >> > > Andrew - I've always thought the update script just updates the > > > >> > CordovaLib? > > > >> > > I doubt it will actually patch the main projectfile for the > > > >> Architecture > > > >> > > settings (although we could do that I suppose) > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Brian LeRoux <b...@brian.io> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I think the platforms separation might have to come w/ > andrew's > > > other > > > >> > > > proposal. (Or at least more discussion about how seperating > > > >> versioning > > > >> > of > > > >> > > > platforms will impact cli/plugman code.) > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > I'm always a +1 for releasing. Ideally we exercise these new > > steps > > > >> more > > > >> > > > often so the whole thing becomes a total non event. As it > should > > > be. > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > Fun fact, we shipped 67 releases of the phonegap distribution > > last > > > >> > year. > > > >> > > No > > > >> > > > surprise we are not on track to match this year. (Yet.) > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Andrew Grieve < > > > agri...@chromium.org > > > >> > > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > The main reason would be for iOS Xcode 5.1 support. Probably > > > we'd > > > >> > want > > > >> > > to > > > >> > > > > have the update project settings modified via the update > > script > > > >> (not > > > >> > > sure > > > >> > > > > if that's been handled yet). > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I don't think we need to wait for a > > > split-up-the-platform-release > > > >> > > > proposal, > > > >> > > > > or else risk delaying too long. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I do think someone needs to do a one-over of our release > > process > > > >> > though > > > >> > > > now > > > >> > > > > that we're using dist/ & votes more properly. > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I've finished moving the docs from the wiki to: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/cadence-release-process.md > > > >> > > > > , > > > >> > > > > So you can use the github editor to create pull requests to > it > > > :) > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Joe Bowser < > > bows...@gmail.com> > > > >> > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > NOT IT! > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I would hold off 3.5 before we decide what we're doing > with > > > >> > > platforms. > > > >> > > > > > I don't feel Android needs a new release yet, but I've > been > > > >> > working > > > >> > > > > > on an experimental branch for a bit, so I'm not 100% sure. > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Michal Mocny < > > > >> mmo...@chromium.org > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > Feels like we just released 3.4! > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We discussed this at the Hangout: Lets split out the > > > platforms, > > > >> > and > > > >> > > > > > remove > > > >> > > > > > > Release Notes from the dist artifact, so as to make the > > > dist/ > > > >> > > > artifacts > > > >> > > > > > > easier to release/test. Also makes it easier to have > > > different > > > >> > > > > > individual > > > >> > > > > > > responsible for each platform. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > (We also discussed moving to semver and potentially > > shipping > > > >> > > weekly / > > > >> > > > > > > independently of each other -- but I think we should > leave > > > that > > > >> > for > > > >> > > > > > future > > > >> > > > > > > releases.) > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Finally, we also discussed starting to use release > > managers. > > > >> NOT > > > >> > > IT! > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -Michal > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Steven Gill < > > > >> > > stevengil...@gmail.com > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> How are people feeling about doing a 3.5.0 release > soon? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >
