Anis - Gorkem wants <feature> since it works with his IDE. *Why* do you prefer <feature>?
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:56 PM, Anis KADRI <anis.ka...@gmail.com> wrote: > I prefer <feature>. > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Mark Koudritsky <kam...@google.com> wrote: > >> I prefer the <dependency> syntax. It's shorter, more intuitive and >> consistent with plugin.xml. I don't see much value in _partial_ compliance >> with the w3c spec. >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@google.com> wrote: >> >> > Gorkem is adding awesome feature to restore plugins/platforms your app >> > depends on. There is some debate on the correct syntax to use in the >> > config.xml file: do we use (a) plugin.xml style <dependency> tags, or (b) >> > w3c widget spec <feature> tags? >> > >> > Gorkem votes (b), arguing that using widget spec helps his tools with >> > editing config.xml (existing gui editor, I assume?), and has implemented >> a >> > PR for it (https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/165). >> > >> > I vote (a), arguing that we already don't match widget spec, and already >> > have established syntax for for specifying plugin urls & versions in >> > plugin.xml (with docs and examples), and its better for our CLI >> > implementation to use existing plugin deps handlers. >> > >> > What do you think? >> > >> > Background: read full thread titled "[GitHub] cordova-cli pull request: >> > CB-6469" >> > >>
