+1 Verified archive and signatures, compared zip content against repo tagged at 3.5.0. Tested with mobile-spec: automated tests look good, I saw a couple minor issues in the manual tests but that should not hold up the release, and I’m not sure if that behavior is new to 3.5.
[Aside: I’m reminded how much the manual tests in mobile-spec need documentation. I got a start on that in InAppBrowser, would like to continue that for the others.] On May 16, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > Verified archive, signatures and hashes against repo at tag 3.5.0. > Tested with mobile-spec, platform works correctly. Suspect issues with > File plugin and regular expression parsing relating to WebViews, but > this shouldn't hold up the release. > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> >> Verified archive, signatures and hashes, against repo at tag 3.5.0 >> Tested with mobile spec enough to see that the platform works correctly, >> plugin failures notwithstanding >> >> >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Steven Gill <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Please review and vote on this 3.5.0 Android Release. >>> >>> Release issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-6586 >>> >>> Repos ready to be released have been published to dist/dev: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cordova/CB-6586/final >>> >>> The package was published from the corresponding git tag: >>> cordova-android: 3.5.0 (82bc714ed9) >>> >>> Upon a successful vote I will upload the archives to dist/, publish them to >>> NPM, and post the corresponding blog post. >>> >>> Voting guidelines: >>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/release-voting.md >>> >>> Voting will go on for a minimum of 48 hours. >>> >>> I vote +1: >>> * Verified archive >>> * Ensured continuous build was green when repos were tagged >>>
