Make it available Ally, of course that sounds interesting!
I'm sure a few of us have suggestions for improvements too.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:38 AM, Ally Ogilvie <aogil...@wizcorp.jp> wrote:
> Marcel, Sorry for the late reply.
>
> For some games that I produce where the entire game is served to the client
> (requires no .html in the application) we have a tool called "spellcaster".
> Spellcaster handles internet connectivity, localisation and Cordova code
> injection. It works as follows:
>
> One simply adds an application URL to Cordova's config.xml in <content
> src=YOUR_URL_HERE>
>
> - Spellcaster will check for an active internet connection. If one is not
> found Spellcaster will continue retrying at a set interval.
> - Spellcaster downloads the content of the provided application URL and
> stores to application cache (overriding any existing loader).
> - Spellcaster injects Cordova script tags just after the <head> tag.
> - Spellcaster loads the new *loader into the WebView
>
> *loader is your html to load.
>
> Are people still in need of such a solution? I could have this code made
> public it just needs a public sanitise check. Spellcaster supports iOS and
> Android.
> For iOS it requires 1 line of code to be added to
> didFinishLaunchingWithOptions.
> For Android it requires these overrides in onCreate:
>
> @Override
> public void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
> super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
> super.init();
>
> @Override
> public void init() {
> Spellcaster spellcaster = new Spellcaster();
> spellcaster.init(this, Config.getStartUrl(), appView);
> ...
>
> @Override
> public void init(org.apache.cordova.CordovaWebView webView,
> org.apache.cordova.CordovaWebViewClient webViewClient,
> org.apache.cordova.CordovaChromeClient webChromeClient) {
> super.init(webView, webViewClient, webChromeClient);
>
> Spellcaster spellcaster = new Spellcaster();
> spellcaster.init(this, Config.getStartUrl(), webView);
> ...
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 2:17 PM, purplecabbage <purplecabb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > It is great design for development, and netflix.
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Aug 1, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Marc Weiner <mhweiner...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > It's technically possible, and even (arguably) legal according to
> Apple's
> > > documentation, depending on the nature of the code and how it's
> > implemented:
> > >
> > > 3.3.2 An Application may not download or install executable code.
> > > Interpreted code may only be used in an Application if all scripts,
> code
> > > and interpreters are packaged in the Application and not downloaded.
> The
> > > only exception to the foregoing is scripts and code downloaded and run
> by
> > > Apple's built-in WebKit framework, provided that such scripts and code
> do
> > > not change the primary purpose of the Application by providing features
> > or
> > > functionality that are inconsistent with the intended and advertised
> > > purpose of the Application as submitted to the App Store.
> > >
> > > However, I would only do so if the code is coming from a server that
> you
> > > control, and if you are able to control what code is getting executed.
> > > Loading in 3rd party, unverified scripts into your Cordova view is a
> big
> > > "no-no" for security reasons, and could get your app delisted (or
> > rejected).
> > >
> > > If anyone else has more information on the topic, I'd be interested in
> > > hearing it.
> > >
> > > Marc
> > >
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Victor Sosa <sosah.vic...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Frederico.
> > >>
> > >> While what you are saying about the policies stores is true, this
> > applies
> > >> to public stores only (as far as I can tell). For on-premise app
> stores
> > >> this might be false because each store owner need to set and apply the
> > >> governance for the apps. It could end on horrible results due to a bad
> > >> implementation.
> > >>
> > >> I concur with everyone, it is possible but awful design
> > >> On Aug 1, 2014 4:35 PM, "Frederico Galvão" <
> > >> frederico.gal...@pontoget.com.br>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I don't have the details in hand at the moment, but I remember seeing
> > in
> > >>> more than one application store last year policies being changed to
> > >>> disallow remote code to run in an application on-demand. Such rules
> > >> *could*
> > >>> as well be applied to Cordova apps that load remote content
> considered
> > as
> > >>> code (HTML isn't, but JS is). It's not only a security concern per
> se,
> > >> but
> > >>> also an imposed limitation on the stores (which were obviously
> created
> > >> for
> > >>> security concerns in the first place).
> > >>>
> > >>> Not even mentioning the issues with providing the right cordova.js
> > >> version
> > >>> from the remote server not really knowing where the request came
> from.
> > >>> However, it's good to note too that aside Phonegap Developer App,
> there
> > >> is
> > >>> also Adobe Hydration that does the exact same thing as a side service
> > to
> > >>> Phonegap Build. I don't know if they've come into any of the issues
> > >>> mentioned, and I haven't even heard of it being used in production.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 2014-08-01 17:36 GMT-03:00 purplecabbage <purplecabb...@gmail.com>:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I agree with all your statements Marcel. I use this approach
> > frequently
> > >>> in
> > >>>> dev for fast turnaround.
> > >>>> Ultimately App Store policies decide what can and cannot be done.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regarding security, there is nothing I can do with a remote page
> that
> > I
> > >>>> can't already do inside my app. It's an issue of trust.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Aug 1, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I agree that it is not recommended, but it's possible. I delved
> into
> > >>>>> this question here:
> > >>>>> https://github.com/shazron/phonegap-questions/issues/37
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The PhoneGap Developer App is an example of how this is working at
> > >>>>> http://app.phonegap.com but they do some proxying to get around
> the
> > >>>>> CORS limitations I believe.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Marcel Kinard <
> cmarc...@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> I've been getting occasional questions about users trying to use
> > >>>> remotely-loaded (non-local) HTML pages with Cordova (in the webview,
> > >> not
> > >>>> InAppBrowser), and still expecting to have access to the plugin APIs
> > >>>> (camera is a popular one). My response so far is: "This is an
> > >> unsupported
> > >>>> configuration, because Cordova was not designed for this and the
> > >>> community
> > >>>> does no testing of this configuration. While it can work in some
> > >>>> circumstances, it is not recommended nor supported."
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> My definition of "unsupported" is not that it is incapable, but
> that
> > >>> we
> > >>>> don't claim that it is supposed to work, and more importantly, we
> > won't
> > >>>> actively fix user-submitted defects on this topic.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> The main concern I have on this is same origin policy, and
> matching
> > >>> the
> > >>>> remotely-served cordova.js with the locally-installed native Cordova
> > >>>> platform to avoid version mismatch.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Do you think I'm out in-the-weeds on this, or do you agree?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> If you agree, what would you think of a blurb in cordova-docs
> > >>> somewhere
> > >>>> that captures this gist?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks for your feedback!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>>
> > >>> *Frederico Galvão*
> > >>>
> > >>> Diretor de Tecnologia
> > >>>
> > >>> PontoGet Inovação Web
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ( +55(62) 8131-5720
> > >>>
> > >>> * www.pontoget.com.br <http://www.pontoget.com/>
> > >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.wizcorp.jp/>Ally Ogilvie
> Lead Developer - MobDev. | Wizcorp Inc. <http://www.wizcorp.jp/>
> ------------------------------
> TECH . GAMING . OPEN-SOURCE WIZARDS+ 81 (0)3-4550-1448 | Website
> <http://www.wizcorp.jp/> | Twitter <https://twitter.com/Wizcorp> |
> Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/Wizcorp> | LinkedIn
> <http://www.linkedin.com/company/wizcorp>
>
