Okay, thanks to Carlos!

CI is green for master and 3.6.x

I have retagged 3.6.x current HEAD as 3.6.1 and we can rebuild the packages
for those only.

I am seeing an issue with the tarballs for windows+wp8
The repos both need to be packaged from the root of the repo, and not the
child folder windows/wp8 respectively.

I am not sure if this is a coho packaging issue, or if there is something
else that Steve does, but I will look into the coho stuff so we can get
this process to be so simple we can release and vote every 3 days ....


@purplecabbage
risingj.com


On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 on having CI for platforms repos
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Jesse need to make up your mind on node_modules
> >
> > there is a diff between master and 3.6.x
> >
> > Need to make a decision on where you want "node_modules" with the checkin
> > files
> > either in root along side package.json, or if inside bin\node_modules
> then
> > need to remove the "dependencies and bundleDependecies" from package.json
> >
> > Also the error is related to missing files inside "node_modules/nopt/bin"
> > the top .gitignore is ignoring "bin" so "nopt\bin" is not present in git
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I am on it. node_modules issue
> >>
> >> cordova-windows also has appveyor smoke tests
> >>
> >> @purplecabbage
> >> risingj.com
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Is this something you can look at, or are you out of time because of
> >> your
> >> > move and could use some help?
> >> >
> >> > On Sep 5, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > WP8 build is failing
> >> > > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/Humbedooh/cordova-wp8
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Santana
> > <csantan...@gmail.com>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Carlos Santana
> <csantan...@gmail.com>
>

Reply via email to