Okay - so - there's a pretty nasty CLI blocker bug right now.  Plugins with 
dependencies don't install (this affects all platforms).  In my opinion, we 
need to get a CLI release out really soon.  Are we closed on this topic, or do 
we need to look at doing the old process to get this out the door while we are 
still talking?

There are also a series of other bugs in the currently tagged "3.6.4" platforms 
for Android, Windows, and Windows Phone 8.  These can be handled independently, 
but the CLI bug can't.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7670

-Chuck

-----Original Message-----
From: Treggiari, Leo [mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:23 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: RE: Independent platform release summary

I’ll have to admit that this seems a bit weird.  That is, independent versions 
of the CLI and platforms, with a “Cordova release” named “something” – e.g. a 
date?

Imagine a user wants to know whether the new whitelist entry in config.xml is 
supported in the versions of CLI and platforms that they have – assuming they 
understand the distinction between the CLI and platforms to begin with.  They 
use some command to list the versions of the “things” (CLI and platforms) they 
have installed.  They go to the individual documentation of the “things” and 
try to figure it out.

The way the Cordova documentation works today is nice with the combo box where 
I can select a Cordova version – 3.6.0, 3.5.0, ...  What would the combo box 
contain in the new versioning scheme and how many entries would there be?  Are 
the answers “dates” and “lots of dates”?  Or would there be no Cordova version 
documentation other than an explanation of how to get the list of “things” you 
currently have and where to find the documentation on them.

To “pin” or not to “pin.

Note that, to me, the pinning choice defines what happens when I use “cordova 
{plugin | platform} add foo” with no specific version specified.

I’ve understood, so far at least, that plugins are not pinned (an add always 
fetches something) and platforms are pinned to a CLI version (an add tells the 
CLI that I will be using that platform (already installed) for this project).  
Everything I have read which includes 1 book and the on-line project 
documentation, suggest that, even if not stating it explicitly.  E.g. plugins 
talk about “fetching” and platforms don’t.  There is a way to fetch a specific 
version of platform support.  That’s good and if I do that it is up to me to 
understand the compatibility of the specific version I requested.

Is this true?  If so then the npm cordova behavior seems weird.  That is, if I 
“npm install cordova” I get a set of pinned platforms.  If I “npm update 
cordova”, I get a new CLI and nothing else – i.e. not the platforms that were 
pinned to that version of the CLI?

Should the plugin and platform ‘pin’ behavior be the same?

Should both be pinned?  Some may find this alternative “blasphemous” but the 
core plugin versions tested with a version of the CLI could be pinned to the 
version of the CLI.

Should both not be pinned?  It would be more consistent and if users are OK 
with plugins being unpinned, why not platforms?

But maybe plugins and platforms are different.  Plugins are purely run-time 
code.  Platforms are primarily tooling with some run-time code.  Does that 
difference make the current pinning behavior the best choice.

Maybe, but personally I would prefer both to be pinned – i.e. I install a 
version of Cordova, and until I update it, every time I add a platform or 
‘core’ plugin, I get the same thing.

Leo

From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:47 PM
To: Treggiari, Leo
Cc: Michal Mocny; Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary

With this direction, there is no single number.  Users should not functionally 
care about CLI version, so there will just be the platform versions that 
matter, really.

Downstreams can of course put labels on combinations of versions, so "PhoneGap 
4" may be Android 4, iOS 3.8, and etc.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Treggiari, Leo 
<leo.treggi...@intel.com<mailto:leo.treggi...@intel.com>> wrote:
> Did I miss anything?

I don't think we closed on this (I had to leave the meeting a little early) but 
a remaining question is how to version what we (and users) call "Cordova".  
Assuming a "Cordova" version is a point in time collection of the latest CLI 
version + platform versions + plugin versions.  Is the Cordova version semver 
(using what algorithm with respect to its contained components) or is that what 
you meant by  ""latest as of Oct 2014" or something".

Thanks,
Leo

-----Original Message-----
From: mmo...@google.com<mailto:mmo...@google.com> 
[mailto:mmo...@google.com<mailto:mmo...@google.com>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 1:13 PM
To: Michal Mocny
Cc: Marcel Kinard; dev
Subject: Re: Independent platform release summary Thanks everyone for 
participation in what was a long and grueling discussion.

Summary of current proposal:
- Cad-ver is dead.
- Everything moves Sem-ver, with platforms continuing from current versions and 
diverging over time.
- CLI potentially gets a significant version bump to showcase this reset (to 
5.0 or 10.0, not yet settled)
- Pinning default platform versions *will* continue for the time being, but it 
will be trivial to override the default.
- Platforms will have CLI <engine> tag equivalent (unclear yet if as node 
peerDependency or otherwise) so devs will know when they need to 
upgrade/downgrade CLI for non-default platform versions.
- After a platform update, eventually CLI will release to "pin" the new 
default, and bump its PATCH/MINOR version (unless CLI had a functional update 
at same time that requires a larger bump).
- After you update CLI, your existing projects don't change & platform upgrades 
remain explicit, but you will now get warnings if your installed platforms are 
older than the CLI pinned versions.
- Event MAJOR changes to platforms are not MAJOR updates to the CLI, unless 
there is an actual breaking change to the CLI tool (i.e. new CLI will no longer 
work with the currently installed platform).
- Platform and CLI docs have to split out and be released & versioned alongside 
each (like plugins).  Cross references from one to the other will only be 
needed in a few places.


Note: The CLI-Platform compatibility story is functionally no different than we 
have today.  If you upgrade your CLI and there is a breaking change, you will 
have to re-create your projects or downgrade CLI again.
Now we plan to be more explicit about it and offer warnings.

Note: There is no concept of a "fancy-pants" release other than to say "latest 
as of Oct 2014" or something.  Platforms don't have a single common set of 
functionality, so CadVer was somewhat misleading already in that sense.  We 
could introduce a concept of "API Level" for exec bridge or something for use 
by plugins, but not sure that has value.


What wasn't covered that came to mind after the fact:
- When there is an update available for CLI, should we give a warning to 
update? (this is useful, but isn't common for npm modules.  I think we already 
do this from plugman when you try to publish plugins?).


Did I miss anything?

-Michal

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Michal Mocny 
<mmo...@chromium.org<mailto:mmo...@chromium.org>> wrote:

> External Public link for those that just want to watch/chat:
> https://plus.google.com/events/cm4l0vifcig920qkhpn5stqiet4
>
> Hangout link to join the conversation:
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/hoaevent/AP36tYcNwXEyet4Xv_23HiTl4I
> K0jsM4NlmGy5kbLsPIW3SnOsUEIQ?authuser=0&hl=en
>
> See you in 30 minutes.
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Michal Mocny 
> <mmo...@chromium.org<mailto:mmo...@chromium.org>> wrote:
>
>> +dev list again
>>
>> Not everyone could make 1pm, not everyone could make 2pm.  While I 
>> don't think we need a full 2 hours, I'm hoping to start late and end 
>> early -- proving opportunity people to pop in at either time and chime in.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marcel Kinard 
>> <cmarc...@gmail.com<mailto:cmarc...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is the expected duration 1 hour or 2 hours?
>>>
>>> On Oct 8, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Michal Mocny 
>>> <mmo...@chromium.org<mailto:mmo...@chromium.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > So it looks like Today 1-3 EST or Friday 1-3 EST are the best times.
>>> I'm
>>> > going to start the ball rolling to do this TODAY, but if that 
>>> > proves
>>> too
>>> > short notices we'll move it to Friday.
>>> >
>>> > I'll email out links to hangout at 12:30 or so, and I'm hoping 
>>> > Steven
>>> can
>>> > make it before 2pm since he's been most active with releases recently.
>>> >
>>> > -Michal
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to