I haven't seen tap/tape until Brian mentioned it here. From a quick read, it looks like a port of the tests from Jasmine to tape will be required on the runner side. Then we can use whatever reporting we want that can consume tap. So if I understand it correctly, the existing tests aren't throwaway, but getting off Jasmine certainly won't be free. Assuming that tape is less brittle and not substantially less functional that Jasmine, could be a net win. Doing the port looks like it will take a fair amount of crank-turning.
On Oct 30, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Brian LeRoux <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope. > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2014, 5:04 PM Jesse <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I would much rather we fix things, than continually rewrite + discard, >> which seems to be the norm these days. >> tape/tap would require us to throw away thousands of jasmine2 based tests >> wouldn't it? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
