I agree, we're not really supporting these devices, and it is disingenuous of the project to advertise that we do. Any apps concerning themselves with privacy/security won't be targeting or testing on those devices either.
I think a clean break w/ the message 4.x === 4.x, coupled with many webviews and we have a very solid forward looking release. On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Michal Mocny <mmo...@chromium.org> wrote: > Does it really matter? I think Joe summarized it best, we can only claim > to support what is actually being supported (aka actively tested, actively > maintained). Market share doesn't impact that. > > Not that we should not actively break 2.3 support, but with 3.7 on the > horizon, and big changes coming in 4.0, it would be nice to signal that as > the last version supporting 2.3 and have us be free to make changes that > cannot be compatible with the older version. > > -Michal > > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Joe Bowser <bows...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, where are these numbers coming from? Can we get a breakdown by > region? > > > > On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 3:30:23 AM Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Another stat: Forbes estimates that the existing number of Android > phones > > > is 1.56 billion. Five percent of that is 78 million. > > > > > > > On Jan 13, 2015, at 1:14 AM, Ally Ogilvie <aogil...@wizcorp.jp> > wrote: > > > > > > > > moar stats: > > > > https://mixpanel.com/trends/#report/android_os_adoption/ > > > from_date:-365,to_date:0 > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > > > > > > > > >
