Awesome! Do let us know if you need help.  Nikhil was digging in a bit but 
we'll hold given this update.

-Chuck

From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 11:29 AM
To: Chuck Lantz
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Plugin history purged from registry?

It looks like the problem lies with the check I added to prevent plugman 
0.22.17 from publishing. I have removed that check and updated the DB. In the 
process of uploading old core plugins now.
I will figure out a better check after all of the plugins have been uploaded 
again.

On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 8:17 PM, Chuck Lantz 
<cla...@microsoft.com<mailto:cla...@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Yeah Visual Studio is in a similar boat for projects where devs have not used a 
plugin before.  (We fortunately switched to storing the plugins in the project 
in our latest update so existing projects work.)  We're directing people to use 
git URIs near term when acquiring plugins.

Steve, let us know if you need assistance. I can chat with folks about pitching 
in if it would be helpful. (But know too many cooks can be a problem too.)

________________________________________
From: Nick Martin <n...@meteor.com<mailto:n...@meteor.com>>
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2015 6:50 PM
To: Steven Gill
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org<mailto:dev@cordova.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Plugin history purged from registry?
Hi Steven,

Thank you for your work on this issue. I know it's the weekend, and I
appreciate you going above and beyond.

Do you have any idea if and when old versions of plugins will be restored
to the site? This issue is biting our users pretty hard -- we pin plugins
to stable versions so users are not taken by surprise when new versions
come out. Old versions being missing means none of our users can re-build
or update their apps!

Even a rough order of magnitude estimate would be helpful. We have to
decide if we need to push out an emergency patch release on Monday to
upgrade to the latest versions still in the registry.

Thanks again,
-- Nick

Reply via email to