Yes, that would be a good idea. On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:58 AM Murat Sutunc <mura...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Should we close resolved bugs such as > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-3452 after a week or so? People > seem to report the bugs and don't reply back. If they decide to revisit > after a long period we can re-open bugs. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Bowser [mailto:bows...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:51 AM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Re: Cleaning up Jira? > > Depends on the platform. I'd say to delete the Android ones since I just > fixed it and tested it, but keep the one where I talk about refactoring it > to clean up the nasty nested threading thing that's going on here. (It's > bad, I had to do bad, bad things to get that to work again.) > > Also, any time Cordova gets killed due to the camera using too much memory > on Android, mark that as Won't Fix. It's the nature of Intents on earlier > versions of Android, and I haven't seen it happen on 4.4 or 5.x yet. That > said, I have to try and get some super low-end 5.x devices. (I'm looking > at you Moto E) > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:48 AM Murat Sutunc <mura...@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > > Hey, > > I was looking at the camera bugs (201 of them atm!) and some of them > > look pretty stale. Is it ok to close the bugs that no longer repro on > > the latest version of platform/plugin? Or close bugs which are > > resolved as can't repro? I think it would be much better to have few > > but actionable bugs than 10s of stale ones :) Thoughts?? > > > > Thanks, > > Murat > > >
