Don't we have to publish the plugin to npm for this to be picked up? I think
npm does not look at the git repo itself. Also, we might as well remove the
license, ASF does not require docs to have the license header - only sources.
.md files should ideally be part of RAT excludes.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 8:28 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: "Best" place to browse plugins
Done - so how soon will npm pick up on the change so I can see?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Raymond Camden <raymondcam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok. So... this is my first time. I commit to the repo and... in theory
> npm will just pick it up. Here goes nothing.
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Looks ok to me. Not sure if Apache RAT passes it, but I think it would.
>>
>> If it doesn't its easily worked around since we would have manually
>> verified that it passes (and put it in the ignore file for RAT)
>>>
--
===========================================================================
Raymond Camden, Developer Advocate for MobileFirst at IBM
Email : raymondcam...@gmail.com
Blog : www.raymondcamden.com
Twitter: raymondcamden
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
