I think it's a web of trust thing
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/6841/ways-to-sign-gpg-public-key-so-it-is-trusted
I signed Steve's key, but you won't trust it unless you sign my key, and so
on.. there must be a link of trust. But then I signed his key and I still
get this warning, so...

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not sure. Try GPG Keychain -> Key -> Update Key From Server (after
> selecting Steve's key)
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Carlos Santana <csantan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> So I need to re-import all the pgp keys?
>>
>> I just did the two import commands here:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/setting-up-gpg.md#importing-pmc-members-pgp-keys
>>
>> Do I need to do it again?
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 7:17 PM Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I think someone else on the team needs to key sign Steve's key (use GPG
>> > Keychain). I just did for both his apache and gmail keys.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Homer, Tony <tony.ho...@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks for replying Steve - I see what you mean about dependencies,
>> > hadn't
>> > > thought about that.
>> > >
>> > > When I did `coho verify-archive` I got "gpg: WARNING: This key is not
>> > > certified with a trusted signature!".
>> > > I guess this is ok, but is there any way to address the warning?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 8/13/15, 2:47 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Audit license headers is the important one.
>> > > >
>> > > >At the end of the day, we aren't shipping any of our dependencies.
>> They
>> > > >are
>> > > >all downloaded by our users. We can contact module authors who don't
>> > have
>> > > >license listed to get them to list one.
>> > > >
>> > > >-Steve
>> > > >
>> > > >On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Homer, Tony <tony.ho...@intel.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I'm trying to validate the tools release.
>> > > >> I'm following the instructions[1], but I haven't used coho before
>> and
>> > am
>> > > >> not sure about the results.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> `coho audit-license-headers -r js -r lib -r cli -r plugman`
>> > > >> The doc warns that audit-license-headers has false positives, so
>> I'm
>> > > >> ignoring the following results:
>> > > >> ./appveyor.yml
>> > > >> ./tasks/vendor/commonjs-tests/*
>> > > >> ./tasks/vendor/jasmine/*
>> > > >> ./spec-cordova/*
>> > > >> ./spec-plugman/*
>> > > >> ./src/plugman/help.txt
>> > > >> Are these are all false positives?
>> > > >> If yes, I think the audit-license-headers results are ok.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> `coho check-license -r tools`
>> > > >> I got a lot of results so I started adding what I think are false
>> > > >> positives to the license filter:
>> > > >> "ISC","Public Domain","WTFPL","ASF","Unlicense","Artistic-2.0"
>> > > >> I also updated to nlf 1.3.2 in order to get nicer output and a fix
>> for
>> > > >>the
>> > > >> single license under licenses bug [2].
>> > > >> I still get 88 results for packages with no license entry in
>> > > >>package.json.
>> > > >> (plus xmldom, which has a syntax error in the license entry but
>> has an
>> > > >> Apache-compatible license)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Are "ISC","Public Domain","WTFPL","ASF","Unlicense","Artistic-2.0"
>> all
>> > > >> Apache-compatible?
>> > > >> Are packages with no license entry ok - any additonal action
>> required?
>> > > >> Should I submit a PR to add the additional license strings to the
>> > filter
>> > > >> and update nlf?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [1]
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/tools-release-pro
>> > > >>cess.md#test
>> > > >> [2] https://github.com/iandotkelly/nlf/pull/22
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to