Yeah, that one.
El viernes, 5 de febrero de 2016, Homer, Tony <[email protected]> escribió: > It took me a while to find it, but I guess you mean CB-10455? > > > > On 2/5/16, 7:56 AM, "julio cesar sanchez" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >I think we just forgot, somebody mentioned this on slack and there is an > >issue open on JIRA. > > > >2016-02-05 13:52 GMT+01:00 Homer, Tony <[email protected] > <javascript:;>>: > > > >> Earlier in this thread, Richard stated: > >> >> This change has been merged into the file, camera, geolocation, and > >> contacts plugins (media did not actually require any change). > >> > >> > >> Media was updated on 1/15 but it still has a "cordova-android > >=5.0.0-dev" > >> engine tag. > >> I couldn't find any other discussion about this on the list and wondered > >> why it was retained for media. > >> Was this an oversight? > >> > >> > >> Thanks! > >> Tony > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 1/15/16, 4:40 PM, "Simon MacDonald" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >> >LGTM > >> > > >> >+1 > >> > > >> >Simon Mac Donald > >> >http://hi.im/simonmacdonald > >> > > >> >On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Joe Bowser <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Sorry, wrong PR: > >> >> https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-inappbrowser/pull/136 > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > So, what does the timeline look like for a Plugins release. I just > >> did a > >> >> > major change in the InAppBrowser to fix tel: and sms: URIs so they > do > >> >> > stuff, and it'd be cool if this also made if this got looked over > and > >> >> > landed before the next release. > >> >> > > >> >> > https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-inappbrowser/pull/135 > >> >> > > >> >> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Carlos Santana < > [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> > > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> I agree with final compromise, I also had a discussion with Nikhil > >> >> during > >> >> >> holiday break offline and understood the situation, some 3rd party > >> >> plugins > >> >> >> are not open source and customers/devs don't move as fast as we > wish, > >> >> but > >> >> >> having a CLI 6 with latest plugins being backwards compatible with > >> lower > >> >> >> Android API is good base for developers to start upgrading. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:23 PM Steven Gill < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > >> >> >> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Awesome! I'll kick up a discuss thread > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Richard Knoll < > >> [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> >> > > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Hey all, > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > This change has been merged into the file, camera, > geolocation, > >> and > >> >> >> > > contacts plugins (media did not actually require any change). > I > >> was > >> >> >> able > >> >> >> > to > >> >> >> > > build and run mobilespec on cordova-android 4.0.0 and > >> >> >> cordova-android's > >> >> >> > > master. We should probably push for a plugins release soon, > since > >> >> >> there > >> >> >> > are > >> >> >> > > also some major bug fixes to the contacts and camera plugins > that > >> >> were > >> >> >> > > recently pushed. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> >> > > Richard > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> >> >> > > From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:;>] > >> >> >> > > Sent: Friday, January 8, 2016 12:12 PM > >> >> >> > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> >> >> > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Core Plugins and Android API 23 > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > We had a good discussion about this offline with Joe, Simon, > >> Steve, > >> >> >> > Jesse, > >> >> >> > > Parashu and Jason. We came to the following agreement: > >> >> >> > > This is a temporary fix to the plugins which we need to take > to > >> >> ensure > >> >> >> > > Cordova 5.x tools behavior of using the edge plugins does not > >> break > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> > our > >> >> >> > > users. We will pursue the change for all the affected plugins. > >> This > >> >> >> will > >> >> >> > go > >> >> >> > > out in the next PLUGINS release which will happen before the > >> Cordova > >> >> >> 6.0 > >> >> >> > > release. Since this a temporary fix, we aim to remove it in 6 > >> months > >> >> >> > > (giving reasonable time for our user base to move to Cordova > 6.x+ > >> >> >> which > >> >> >> > > will have a better plugin version pinning mechanism). > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> >> > > Nikhil > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > -----Original Message----- > >> >> >> > > From: Simon MacDonald [mailto:[email protected] > <javascript:;>] > >> >> >> > > Sent: Thursday, January 7, 2016 4:00 PM > >> >> >> > > To: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >> >> >> > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Core Plugins and Android API 23 > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > I'm going to play devils advocate a bit here: > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > There are valid reasons why many app developers might not be > >> ready > >> >> >> to > >> >> >> > > > move to API level 23: > >> >> >> > > > 1) They have an app which is stabilizing or in maintenance > >> mode > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> > > > they don't want to risk destabilization by moving to a new > >> major > >> >> >> > > > Cordova version, Cordova Android platform, and Android API > >> level. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > If the developer is not ready to move to a new version of > Cordova > >> >> >> Android > >> >> >> > > or the Android API would it not also follow that they > shouldn't > >> be > >> >> >> > changing > >> >> >> > > their plugin versions? > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > 2) They are using a 3rd-party plugin which has not yet > been > >> >> >> updated > >> >> >> > > > to request Android permissions as required by API level 23. > >> There > >> >> >> are > >> >> >> > > > probably a lot of plugins affected, since access to any of > the > >> >> >> > > > following things on Android M requires runtime permission > >> >> requests: > >> >> >> > > > calendar, contacts, phone, camera, microphone, location, > >> beacons, > >> >> >> > > sensors, SMS, storage. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Right, so if the 3rd party plugin they are using doesn't > support > >> >> >> Android > >> >> >> > M > >> >> >> > > they should either a) not upgrade or b) send a PR to the > plugin > >> >> >> > maintainer > >> >> >> > > so everyone can benefit. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > 3) They might not have the capacity or ability to test > their > >> app > >> >> >> on > >> >> >> > > > devices running Android M. Because API 23 enables the new > >> >> >> permissions > >> >> >> > > > model only on Android M, it requires testing on that > platform. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > Everyone has access to the Android emulator. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > In any of the above cases, developers might still like to > >> benefit > >> >> >> from > >> >> >> > > > some of the major bug fixes in those 5 popular core plugins > >> >> >> mentioned > >> >> >> > > > below. Or even if they weren't specifically looking for bug > >> fixes, > >> >> >> it > >> >> >> > > > would be a much better experience if adding or updating one > of > >> >> those > >> >> >> > > > plugins would just work, rather than failing on Android. The > >> >> >> > > > explanation for the failure will not be obvious to many > users, > >> if > >> >> >> they > >> >> >> > > > overlooked the warning when installing the plugin or if they > >> were > >> >> >> > > > using another tool to add the plugin where the warning > wasn't > >> >> >> surfaced. > >> >> >> > > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Seems like you are describing a tooling problem here. If the > >> tool > >> >> >> > doesn't > >> >> >> > > surface the warning or allows the user to add a plugin that is > >> >> >> > incompatible > >> >> >> > > with the version of Cordova Android that is being used really > >> sounds > >> >> >> > like a > >> >> >> > > bug in the tooling to me. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > Of course developers should be encouraged to upgrade to the > >> latest > >> >> >> > > > most secure highest-quality version of Cordova. But the > >> >> >> encouragement > >> >> >> > > > does not need to be so forceful. This proposed change gives > >> >> >> developers > >> >> >> > > > more time to upgrade, and allows for more choice about when > to > >> >> >> upgrade > >> >> >> > > > individual parts > >> >> >> > > > (plugins) rather than limiting them to all-or-nothing. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > I would argue that the developer has an infinite amount of > time > >> to > >> >> >> > > upgrade. Nothing is forcing you to upgrade to the latest > Cordova > >> >> >> Android > >> >> >> > or > >> >> >> > > Android API. They can continue to use the same version of > Cordova > >> >> >> Android > >> >> >> > > and plugins that are currently working in their app. If the > >> >> developer > >> >> >> is > >> >> >> > > using semver properly and we do our job right they shouldn't > >> pick up > >> >> >> > > breaking changes. For instance, if the API of a plugin > changes we > >> >> bump > >> >> >> > the > >> >> >> > > major version of the plugin so users who setup their > config.xml > >> to > >> >> >> use: > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > <plugin name="cordova-plugin-camera" spec="^1.1.0" /> > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > will effectively prevent the user from picking up the breaking > >> >> change > >> >> >> in > >> >> >> > > camera version 2.0.0. > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > Simon Mac Donald > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhi.im%2fsimonmacdonald&data=01%7c01%7cnikhilkh%40microsoft.com%7c84fb6405edf74f47453208d317beb5e5%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=B8DuMuPF8aUU6xvIlpYTi3LJPs1HbENcHXS8JrHqEu0%3d > >> >> >> > > B > >> >> >> > >> KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB > >> >> >> > > [ X ܚX K K[XZ[ > >> >> >> > > ] ][ X ܚX P ܙ ݘK \ X K ܙ B ܈ Y ] [ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[ > >> >> >> > > ] Z [ ܙ ݘK \ X K ܙ B > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > <javascript:;> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > <javascript:;> > >> >
