Hey We're getting some hiccups on the 6.1 Android Release with Travis. I'm not able to reproduce on the local machine, so we think that it's a travis error with updating packages, so we're going to go ahead with the vote again. Sorry for the delay today.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey > > Look under "What to Test" on this document to see the basics of What to > Test: > https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/ > platforms-release-process.md > > However, this will obviously not catch everything, so people who actually > use the CLI to do development should probably try to make an app with the > new version once it's up for voting, or even before by checking out the > repository and installing it. > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Simon MacDonald < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Sounds good Joe. Can you re-post the official process/doc on how to verify >> a cordova-android release for those who may be doing it for the first >> time? >> >> >> Simon Mac Donald >> http://simonmacdonald.com >> >> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Shazron <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > For those not using Android daily, also give us guidance on testing >> areas >> > of focus >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Hey >> > > >> > > While people have been talking about how critical their fix is for >> > Cordova, >> > > I actually found a critical issue that we missed in Cordova w.r.t >> builds >> > > failing with Android Studio based projects, so I rushed some commits >> in >> > for >> > > Cordova-Android 6.1 release. >> > > >> > > The reason that this is 6.1 and 6.01 is because we're also bumping the >> > API >> > > level to 25 so that we can support the latest version of Android out >> in >> > the >> > > wild, which is on the Google Pixel. There's no real difference >> between >> > the >> > > two, and the current beta is actually 7.1.1. >> > > >> > > BTW, it would be helpful if more people tested this release before we >> go >> > > and vote on it so we don't have to do a 6.1.1. The Apache process >> makes >> > > releasing time-intensive, and I'd rather be working instead of waiting >> > > around for things to be released over and over again. >> > > >> > > What are people's thoughts on this? >> > > >> > > Joe >> > > >> > >> > >
