File it! On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 1:42 PM, Filip Maj <maj....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is that concensus? Time to file an issue? I love :knife:'ing code > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:21 PM, Tommy Williams <to...@devgeeks.org> > wrote: > > +1 to drop it > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Simon MacDonald < > simon.macdon...@gmail.com > >> wrote: > > > >> +1 to drop it. > >> > >> Simon Mac Donald > >> http://simonmacdonald.com > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > +1 drop it altogether. > >> > We can't be the arbiter of what's good or bad, and of course we don't > >> have > >> > the time nor desire to do so IMO. > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1000 I was strongly against having an app showcase when it was > >> proposed > >> > > for the new site. Nobody ever wants to maintain it. > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Jesse <purplecabb...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > +1 to dropping it from cordova > >> > > > Let's just link to phonegap-showcase, onsenui-showcase and > >> > ionic-showcase > >> > > > pages ... I think we should focus on being the best engine and let > >> the > >> > > > downstreams do the marketing. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > @purplecabbage > >> > > > risingj.com > >> > > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 12:43 PM, julio cesar sanchez < > >> > > > jcesarmob...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > I liked Kerri's idea about only posting open source apps. I > think > >> > users > >> > > > can > >> > > > > benefit of it. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > El 25 jul. 2017 7:52 p. m., "Joe Bowser" <bows...@gmail.com> > >> > escribió: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > +1 to no longer supporting the Apps section. Downstream > projects > >> > get > >> > > > > more > >> > > > > > benefit from this than we do, IMO. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Filip Maj < > maj....@gmail.com> > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I'm of the opinion that we, the cordova devs are already > >> sinking > >> > > > under > >> > > > > > > the amount of incoming PRs and TODOs just with maintaining > the > >> > > > > > > tooling, platforms, plugins, and docs. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I think it would be better to turf it and let downstream > >> projects > >> > > do > >> > > > > > > that stuff if they wish. I think PhoneGap has one, so does > >> ionic. > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Kerri Shotts < > >> > > kerrisho...@gmail.com > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > > > If we’re going to have an apps section on the website, it > >> would > >> > > be > >> > > > > good > >> > > > > > > to keep it updated. For example, the ReactEurope app goes > to a > >> > 404 > >> > > > > page. > >> > > > > > > Buildr navigates to an iTunes page that is not available in > the > >> > US > >> > > > > > region, > >> > > > > > > so doesn’t tell me anything (would be better to link to a > >> website > >> > > > > > instead). > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Personally, it might be better just to drop the section > >> > entirely, > >> > > > > since > >> > > > > > > it will require maintenance, would end up with some > subjective > >> > > > criteria > >> > > > > > > (leading to “why them and not us?”), and would need to be > >> rotated > >> > > as > >> > > > > new > >> > > > > > > apps are added to prevent a huge list of apps on the front > >> page. > >> > I > >> > > > like > >> > > > > > the > >> > > > > > > idea, but maybe it would be better to have a Cordova App > >> gallery > >> > > > (akin > >> > > > > to > >> > > > > > > Plugin search, cocoapods, etc.)… but that could easily be > done > >> by > >> > > the > >> > > > > > > community, since we’re tight on resources as it is. > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > That said, if we’re going to accept apps, we need some > >> > > (reasonable) > >> > > > > > > criteria for acceptance, along with the proviso that we > won’t > >> > > > > necessarily > >> > > > > > > always feature the app (since we don’t want to end up > featuring > >> > > 1000 > >> > > > > apps > >> > > > > > > on the front page). > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Some starting criteria: > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > * Should currently be available for sale/download on the > >> > > > appropriate > >> > > > > > app > >> > > > > > > stores. > >> > > > > > > > * The product needs to have a website where we can link > >> > > > (redirecting > >> > > > > > > into iTunes is not ideal). > >> > > > > > > > * The product should fit with Cordova’s CoC, since it’s > being > >> > > > > featured > >> > > > > > > on the front page. > >> > > > > > > > * The app itself should: > >> > > > > > > > * be visually appealing and well designed (this is > >> > > subjective, > >> > > > > but > >> > > > > > > no getting around that…) > >> > > > > > > > * actually work (this would require someone > downloading & > >> > > > testing > >> > > > > > > it. Paid apps would need to supply a review copy for free.) > >> > > > > > > > * be performant (no jank, quick response to user > input, > >> > etc.) > >> > > > > > > > * be in production (not just a demo app) > >> > > > > > > > * be more than just wrapping a remote website > >> > > > > > > > * Plusses for (but not required): > >> > > > > > > > * Available source code (so others can learn from the > >> app) > >> > > > > > > > * Multiple platform support > >> > > > > > > > * Free or usable trial version so that users can get a > >> good > >> > > > feel > >> > > > > > for > >> > > > > > > a performant Cordova app > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Those are just off the top of my head, so take them as you > >> > will. > >> > > > :-) > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ~ Kerri > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On Jul 24, 2017, at 19:24, Shazron <shaz...@apache.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> https://cordova.apache.org > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > >> Are we still accepting apps? How do we select? > >> > > > > > > >> Right now there are 12. This relates to the Xmind > request to > >> > > dev@ > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------ > ------------------------------ > >> > > > --------- > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > >> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@cordova.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@cordova.apache.org > >
