Having (🤖/👩‍🔧) in the column title turned out to be a bad idea as
it made the messages added to PRs very noisy.
I removed them and added a card with the same information ("column
managed by 👩‍🔧 + 🤖") instead.

As I personally did benefit from having the Platforms PR board in
going through all the existing PRs, I created another one for tooling:

Apache Cordova: Tooling Pull Requests
https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/8?fullscreen=true
Linked repositories: cordova-js cordova-cli cordova-lib cordova-common
cordova-fetch

Unfortunately we hit the "5 linked repositories limit" here as
predicted, and cordova-create and cordova-serve, so I had to "Add
Cards" to them manually by searching for their PRs: `is:open is:pr
repo:apache/cordova-serve`. Will do some research to see if there is a
 workaround for that.

Best,
Jan

2018-09-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Jan Piotrowski <[email protected]>:
> Thanks Raphael, good questions:
>
>> - What's the difference between: "Waiting for Review" and "Pending Approval"?
>
> Yep, that was a new thing for me as well. Let me explain:
> "Waiting for Review" is a state we manually give to a PR after we had
> a look and the title and description is ok, the changes make sense and
> there are no conflicts or failing tests.
> "Pending Approval" is a state that the automation gives to a PR when
> there was some review activity (e.g. "comment" or "request changes")
> but the PR is not _approved_ (yet).
> This also applies in the case that the repo has a "3 approvals before
> merge" requirement for example, then a PR with 1 approval would move
> to that column.
> Maybe also if someone leaves a review who is not a maintainer - but I
> am not 100% sure about that.
> One could also call the column "Review in progress" maybe - but I
> wanted to see it in practice first to be honest.
>
>> - Do we need to distinguish "Blocked: Tests failing" and "Blocked: Conflict"?
>
> We don't need to, but I thought it might be handy.
> A PR in the "tests failing" can be moved to "waiting for review" when
> there is not red x any more that indicates a failing test (because
> there was a new commit or tests were rerun). For conflicts, there is
> no visual indicator and the PR _has_ to be checked manually.
> If there is not much use for that, we can collapse both columns into
> one without much effort. But for now I would leave it as it is to get
> some experience with it.
>
> Best,
> Jan
>
>
>
> 2018-09-03 18:16 GMT+02:00 gandhi rajan <[email protected]>:
>> Looks great Jan. But for some reason I m not able to see the emojis in my
>> chrome browser. Does anyone else have the same issue?
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 6:13 PM Jan Piotrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> with the switch to GitHub for issues I started looking into GitHub
>>> Project boards to help us manage Issues and Pull Requests.
>>>
>>> The first concrete result of this is ready for feedback:
>>>
>>> Apache Cordova - Platforms Pull Requests
>>> https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/7
>>>
>>> As the name implies, this board contains all Pull Requests for the
>>> Platform repositories (ios, android, windows, osx, browser). It can be
>>> used to 1) get an overview of all the PRs for several repositories at
>>> the same time and 2) help us maintainers to find PRs to comment on,
>>> test and approve or merge.
>>>
>>> The project board contains these columns:
>>>
>>> - 🐣 New PR / Untriaged (🤖/👩‍🔧)
>>> - 👷 Blocked: Work in Progress (👩‍🔧)
>>> - ⛔ Blocked: Tests failing (👩‍🔧)
>>> - 💥 Blocked: Conflict (👩‍🔧)
>>> - ⏳ Waiting for Review (👩‍🔧)
>>> - 🙅 Pending Approval (🤖)
>>> - ✅ Approved, waiting for Merge (🤖)
>>> - 🏆 Merged, waiting for Release (🤖)
>>> - ☠️ Closed/Abandoned (🤖)
>>> - 🎈 Released (👩‍🔧)
>>>
>>> The columns itself should cover all the common cases we can encounter
>>> with PRs (Did I miss anything that should be tracked?).
>>>
>>> The column a PR is currently located in is shown in the "Projects"
>>> section of the sidebar of the PR on GitHub. Each time a PR is moved,
>>> the PR gets a "<username> moved this from <foo> to <bar>" line added
>>> at the bottom. The emojis make parsing these info bits a lot easier.
>>>
>>> New PRs can be added to this board a) semi-automatically by clicking
>>> the "Cog" icon next to "Projects" in the sidebar of a PR on Github and
>>> then selecting the board or b) by using the "Add cards" functionality
>>> on the board itself. There is no way to fully automatically add new
>>> PRs to this board yet [1].
>>>
>>> The emojis at the end of the column description (🤖/👩‍🔧) explain who
>>> is responsible for getting PRs into or out of a lane. As you can see
>>> only the first 5 columns (and the last one) have to be handled
>>> manually, the rest is automated.
>>> Our "work" on this board is only to get all PRs from "New PR" to
>>> "Waiting for Review" in the board. Then the automation takes over by
>>> looking if a PR is approved, merged or closed on GitHub itself. At the
>>> end we can manually track what PRs were released to users.
>>>
>>>
>>> Feedback or Comments?
>>>
>>> If this is welcome, I will create identical project boards for tooling
>>> and plugins. [2]
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] If this project board is considered useful and will be used, there
>>> are options to automatically add new PRs to this column via GitHub
>>> apps. We certainly could use this, but I didn't want to spend the time
>>> to configure this up front.
>>>
>>> [2] It will be interesting to see how the automation will work for
>>> e.g. Plugins where we have >5 repositories. Probably we will also need
>>> a workaround the "5 repo per project board" limit from Github via an
>>> GitHub app.
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Gandhi
>>
>> "The best way to find urself is to lose urself in the service of others !!!"

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to