I vote +1
On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 3:47 AM Bryan Ellis <[email protected]> wrote: > > While votes are usually focused on code modifications [1] and package > releases [2], I think it would be helpful to have a formal vote on > improving the release process. The discussion thread received some +1s, > but I would like to make sure this is handled as a formal vote. > > This vote is based on the discussion: > > ``` > [DISCUSS] Improving Release Process & Voting > ``` > > For any questions, please reply in the discussion thread. > > --- > > TL;DR > > This is a summary of what is being voted on: > > 1. Use GitHub Actions (GHA) to create a draft release. > > * Includes automatic signing and checksum creation. > 2. Automatically upload artifacts to Apache Trusted Release (ATR) > for staging. > 3. Use Apache Trusted Releases (ATR) for: > > * Creating a vote > * Submitting a vote > * Finalizing a vote > 4. Use GHA to publish to the npmjs registry. > > ***** > > If you want to read the full release guideline, here is a gist: > > https://gist.github.com/erisu/c45a04c850ef15fc69032e372fa6ec00 > > The guideline in the gist may be updated during the implementation > phase and will be published on the official website once the > implementation has been completed. > > ***** > > I vote +1 > > [1] https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#votes-on-code-modification > [2] https://apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
