erisu commented on issue #115: URL: https://github.com/apache/cordova-discuss/issues/115#issuecomment-4052534527
I believe the original intent of this repository was to use pull requests to discuss and outline significant specification changes or proposals large feature requests. This process is not always followed and is not strict. Usually a discussion might occur within the dev mailing list. If this process was used, and the proposal was approved, it would be merged and serve as a reference for how the implementation should proceed. Here is an example when CocoaPods large improvements was discussed: https://github.com/apache/cordova-discuss/pull/108 I am open to keeping this repository but I also don't mind if we archive it. The only benefit of using PRs is that people can discuss and leave change requests to the proposal. However, the final discussion should always take place on the mailing list, and I believe all of our repos already forward PR submissions and comments there. Regarding the issue tracking for this repository, we could just disable it to prevent new issues from being submitted. I don’t believe this repository should have an issue tracker enabled. Issues should be opened on the appropriate repo or general discussions on the `cordova` repo's discussion board. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
