On 23 December 2014 at 11:26, Daniel Gruno <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd let it run for a week instead (let it end on the 30th), jan - it's > Christmas and people may not be around to check up on things. > 72h is just the bare minimum. > I was simply referring to the incubator rules, as you can see in the mail to [email protected] I have not put a specific deadline on it. rgds jan I. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > > On 2014-12-23 11:24, jan i wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I have today filed our IP-Clearance document and adviced [email protected]. >> There is a lazy consensus rule running 72 hours in order to accept the >> code. >> >> rgds >> jan I. >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: jan i <[email protected]> >> Date: 23 December 2014 at 11:21 >> Subject: [IP-CLEARANCE] Initial source code for Corinthia. >> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >> >> >> Hi. >> >> I have today added >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/public/trunk/ >> content/ip-clearance/corinthia.xml >> >> please check it. I am more than happy to make changes, since some of the >> points was difficult to fill out because this is the initial source code >> for that came with the project. >> >> The code is available on >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/incubator-corinthia.git >> >> CCLA is filed and accepted. >> >> The code uses a modified version of minizip, where the license does not >> match our demands, and the project will replace that code asap. >> >> Thanks in advance for your comments. >> >> rgds >> jan I. >> >> >
