On 31 December 2014 at 08:39, Peter Kelly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 31 Dec 2014, at 2:37 pm, Peter Kelly <[email protected]> wrote: > > And for a complete history like above: > > > > git log —graph stable > > > > or: > > > > git log --oneline --graph master > > Sorry, that second command should say stable instead of master. > Yes we did discuss it rather intensively in budapest, which I think was the reason I was so surprised over the commit (which I with my limited GIT knowledge might have misunderstood in the first place). Sounds like the only thing I loose with your suggestion is a clear timeline, but on the other hand we show more activity on master. I am +1 on this. Does this mean stable need a cleanup ? rgds jan i > > — > Dr Peter M. Kelly > [email protected] > > PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key> > (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966) > >
