Note that HTML formatting is not preserved when I make a plaintext reply. -- replying below to -- From: Svante Schubert [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 03:38 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Coding Standards page
[ ... ] I have a lot of test documents in the ODF Toolkit, the problem is more to sort them according to features and to keep the number small, but with a good coverage to keep the test duration short and efficient. Regards, Svante Sorry, sent too quickly. Hopefully sometimes in the future test documents of a file format are becoming (optional) part of its SDK, even better becoming part of the standard of the file format itself. Like regression tests would become part of a standard to provide a measurement for feature coverage of an application supporting that file format (at least from model perspective, but not necessary rendering). This ability would require not only the specification of the model of the file format, but as well its convertibility (API). As we are specifying at the moment the changes upon the ODF model being used for change-tracking. Regards, Svante <orcmid> Are the ODF Toolkit test documents already organized and should we view that as a structure for collection of tests? If the tests are organized against features of a specification, that would be interesting as well. For Corinthia there may be some common abstraction within which feature-specific tests might live. I don't know if there are details about that, so I am speculating. </orcmid>
