On Jan 18, 2015, at 12:27 PM, jan i wrote: > On 18 January 2015 at 21:18, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes, I keep pointing out that it is the methods and design, not the code >> that I am interested in, but I think I am not being emphatic enough when I >> do that [;<). >> > I know you said that, but at the same time somebody said the word license. > When I look at methods and design I do not need to care about the license, > because I > have to reimplement it anyhow.
Take a look at Apache APR - http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.5/group__apr__getopt.html Lots of other portable goodies. When I mentioned Commons I was thinking APR! Regards, Dave > > >> >> It also provides a way that a transposition to a different programming >> language is correct [;<), by having tests that succeed for both. >> > +1 > >> >> Likewise, I am perfectly willing to mine POI and the ODF Toolkit for >> whatever they have to offer in this respect (although this may apply more >> to the Zip case than the long-form getopt). >> > I am close with zip now, so no need for that. But getopt_long() must be > available in one of the C projects. > > If you only search for the methods and design, have a look at the > opensource C variants on github (or the official one from AT&T). > > rgds > jan i. > > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jan i [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2015 11:35 >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Apache Commons is not really an option in corinthia >> >> Hi >> >> Since apache commons was mentioned as a possible solution to several >> issues, I checked if my memory failed me. >> >> Apache Commons seems to only deliver java code, and can therefore not be >> used in corinthia, we need a C library. >> >> rgds >> jan I. >> >>
