This came across my desk: <http://www.devx.com/wireless/pros-and-cons-of-5-mobile-ui-frameworks.html>.
It is a little thin. It seems to be a little about responsive web, but targeted to development of web pages for browsers on mobile devices. I glanced at Onsen UI at <http://onsen.io/> and <https://github.com/OnsenUI/OnsenUI>. This one is Apache licensed and I agree the work appears pretty slick. It also claims to integrate with Angular, Cordova, etc. jQuery-mobile, <http://jquerymobile.com/> is under the jquery license, a form of BSD license, <https://github.com/jquery/jquery-mobile>. I notice that jQuery tends to be installed with foundation.js too, though not sure what use is made of it on the Corinthia Web. ChocolateChip-UI has a dual-layer offering, one a free MIT License open source and a serious Enterprise subscription version. The difference is apparently with regard to support levels, not the code. On GitHub of course, <https://github.com/sourcebitsllc/chocolatechip-ui>. Ratchet is under the MIT license too, and on GitHub <https://github.com/twbs/ratchet>. Mobile-Angular UI is BSD-like and on GitHub <https://github.com/mcasimir/mobile-angular-ui>. So this in on Bootstrap 3. I agree with the author of the report that Onsen UI is the most impressive in terms of their presentation and what they claim works. Apparently the learning curve and the uniqueness of Onsen UI are considerations. I have no deep sense of any of this. Just information gathering. -- Dennis E. Hamilton [email protected] [email protected] +1-206-779-9430 https://keybase.io/orcmid PGP F96E 89FF D456 628A X.509 certs used and requested for signed e-mail
