On 3 February 2015 at 17:29, Louis Suárez-Potts <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 03-02-2015, at 11:22, jan i <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, February 3, 2015, Louis Suárez-Potts <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/entry/apache_pdfbox_named_an_open > >> > >> My guess is that everyone already knows about this :-) > > > > yup, but did I overlook a relevance for corinthia ? > > > > thanks for the info > > rgds > > jan i > > > > Not directly to Corinthia. I was thinking more in terms that PDFBox grants > those with JVMs to manipulate PDFs ad hoc. As a lot of enterprise docs. are > PDFs, the utility of the service seems plain. (That OpenOffice can do this, > too, to a limited degree, as can other open source applications is known; > that they are not used this way and instead the maximally expensive options > are used just goes to show you that nature doesn’t just abhor a vacuum, it > sucks.) > > But to return to the point. If one aspect of Corinthia is to enable the > manipulation of documents, then it bears watching how other similar, if by > no means congruent or identical, services fare in the market. More > expanded: to investigate the possibility of cooperation if not > collaboration; of mutual interest. > you are completely right, watching is good !!! since it keeps us updated with what is hot out there. I was simply afraid I had missed a point, which would not be the first time. rgds jan I. > > louis > >> > >> Cheers, > >> louis > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Sent from My iPad, sorry for any misspellings. > >
