> On 11-02-2015, at 15:03, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ah well, it wasn't private so much as I didn't want to clutter the list with > fine points. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 11:21 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [OFF-LIST] RE: [DISCUSS] ODF Support in Corinthia > > I don't understand "Developers can cam from good plans."
Helps if my spellchecker doesn’t think it knows better than I which word to use, too. I meant that we can put up plans—not detailed schema nor schedules, but something closer to aspirations, say 'wish lists"—where they are visible to developers. > > I don't think of descriptions and sketches as plans, in the case of software. > Perhaps because I see planning and scheduling confused together so much. > But I think planning at least specifies a progression and staging of work and > I am wary of anything like that absent someone who is prepared to > follow-through. This is probably a trifle though. It’s useful to pry the two apart from a marketing perspective and also product management one. The idea is to attract developer interest. That can be done on several levels. One is more abstract than the other and would reach a different audience. > > PS: It helps me if you do not copy me directly when posting to the list. It > makes it hard for me to know which is the one from the list so that I can > reply without breaking the thread in the mail archive. As it happens, your email client seems to prefer that and I figured you did, too. Won’t happen again, at least not intentionally. louis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Louis Suárez-Potts [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 09:54 > To: [email protected]; Dennis E. Hamilton > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] ODF Support in Corinthia > > >> On 11-02-2015, at 12:45, Dennis E. Hamilton <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> -- replying below to -- >> From: Louis Suárez-Potts [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 06:04 >> To: [email protected]; Dennis E. Hamilton >> Subject: Re: UnRTF Makes HTML >> [ ... ] >> >> Perhaps we need to return, however, to our roadmap ambition. For instance, >> what kind of plans do we have regarding ODF support? If we think it is time >> to return to roadmap discussions, let’s start a new thread on that subject >> and focus, yes? >> >> <orcmid> A start? >> >> I'm not so sure about plans, since it depends on where the developer effort >> comes from, but I can see some definition happening. > > Developers can cam from good plans. > > [ ... ]
