On 24 April 2015 at 18:36, Gabriela Gibson <gabriela.gib...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Peter Kelly <pmke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > > On 24 Apr 2015, at 6:27 pm, Gabriela Gibson <gabriela.gib...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > In ODFConverterGet in file ODFConverter.c line 700 I check the value of
> > the
> > > first child node:
> > >
> > > DFNode *odfDocument = DFChildWithTag(package->contentDoc->docNode,
> > > OFFICE_DOCUMENT);
> > >
> > > I'm assuming the correct value to be 'OFFICE_DOCUMENT' here, at least
> the
> > > name suggests that this should be correct.
> > >
> > > However, the value of this is 1468, where as the child node is 1469,
> > which
> > > in the DFXMLNames.h is listed as 'OFFICE_DISPLAY’.
> >
> > This shouldn’t be happening - can you check the document.xml file in the
> > package (perhaps post an excerpt here) and verify that the root node is
> > <office:document>?
> >
> > If you have manually modified DFXMLNames.h or DFXMLNames.c then this
> would
> > confuse things, and quite possibly cause such a problem to occur. These
> > files were automatically generated from scripts in the ‘schemas’
> directory,
> > and aren’t supposed to be manually modified.
> >
> >
> Nope, I'm innocent (this time).
>
the cast to (unsigned long) can be from my x64 port, I had to do a small
number of casts.

rgds
jan i

>
> However, I did a diff of my current and an older version, just to be sure.
>
> diff
> /home/g/cor-explore/incubator-corinthia/DocFormats/core/src/xml/DFXML.c
> /home/g/cor2/incubator-corinthia/DocFormats/core/src/xml/DFXML.c
> 76c76
> <     DFSAXParser *parser = (DFSAXParser *)xcalloc(1,sizeof(DFSAXParser));
> ---
> >     DFSAXParser *parser = (DFSAXParser *)calloc(1,sizeof(DFSAXParser));
> 142c142
> <         unsigned long attrValueLen = (unsigned long)(attrValueEnd -
> attrValueStart);
> ---
> >         unsigned long attrValueLen = attrValueEnd - attrValueStart;
> 363c363
> <     char *used = (char *)xcalloc(1,count);
> ---
> >     char *used = (char *)calloc(1,count);
> 614c614
> <     char *result = xstrdup(buf->data);
> ---
> >     char *result = strdup(buf->data);
>
> As you can see, strdup was changed and also the (unsigned long) cast has
> been removed. But that should not really be a problem.
>
>
>
> > I’ve just realised that those scripts aren’t very easy to run; they rely
> > on phantomjs which at the time I wrote them (> 2 years ago?) worked on my
> > machine but no longer does. phantomjs isn’t very commonly used anyway;
> > perhaps these should be modified to either work in node.js or in python.
> >
> I tried changing them to node.js but it unfortunately doesn’t include a
> > built-in XML parser, and that lead me into the hell that is the npm
> package
> > distribution, where the first dom-parsing library I found only works with
> > some fork of node.js called io.js. That’s the point where I go “ok, i’ll
> > just use python instead” but that involves completely rewriting the
> > scripts. We do need to get them running again in an easy-to-use way
> though,
> > since when the need arises to add more pre-defined elements it will be
> > necessary to run them. They may still run under phantomjs if you have a
> > working installation.
> >
> > I am currently building phantomjs and we'll know in a few hours if that
> has been a success (the warning about it taking an extra long time are
> probably correct).
>
> I take it I can just run the /schemas/generate.sh script, or do I need to
> modify anything?
>
> G
>
> > —
> > Dr Peter M. Kelly
> > pmke...@apache.org
> >
> > PGP key: http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key <
> http://www.kellypmk.net/pgp-key>
> > (fingerprint 5435 6718 59F0 DD1F BFA0 5E46 2523 BAA1 44AE 2966)
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Visit my Coding Diary: http://gabriela-gibson.blogspot.com/
>

Reply via email to