Hi I agree with Gabriela since it sounds bigger, push it to a branch (no special naming conventions).
Smaller patches (bug fixes mostly) to the running code, should be committed directly to master (only peter transfers from master to stable from time to time). Looking forward to see your work. rgds jan i. Ps. Gabriela are you still helping ian, or looking for other work ? On 22 June 2015 at 15:14, Gabriela Gibson <gabriela.gib...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'd say make a branch, and then push in small increments, whenever you have > something ready baked. > > A huge patch usually is hard to read (at least I find that) > > G > > On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Ian C <i...@amham.net> wrote: > > > No I'm not quite going to give birth, at least not in the usual sense. > > > > Do we have any formality about when to push changes? > > I have an ODF version that follows the Word lenses pattern and > > processes a headers and paragraphs document. One way... that is > > generates a html. > > > > Should I push it? To master? Create a branch? > > > > Or shall we try to agree on a different functional target? > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Ian C > > > > > > -- > Visit my Coding Diary: http://gabriela-gibson.blogspot.com/ >
