On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Antony Blakey <[email protected]> wrote: > > > OK, this code now works for me in a client:
I think opening up the character classes of the db and design doc names like this is OK, as it won't effect people who use the current permitted character set. There's no reason this would not work alongside the aforementioned design and attachment path slash rules. Antony, I think you'll find that once you've written the appropriate JavaScript tests for this feature, it'll be hard to resist adding escaping to the Erlang db-name validation code. Once we've got that patch and it works well, expanding the coverage to include design_doc names should be a no brainer. Thanks for taking this up! -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
