On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm ambivalent. I'll change it, if you want, to use two
>> directories per database, one for canonical data and one for derived data.
>>
>
> I would be happy with two directories. Whether view data is a
> subdirectory of the db directory doesn't matter to me, but I would
> want an easy symlink-able answer to make views go to one disk and db
> data on another.
>
Perhaps a views directory inside each db?
<database_dir>/
376256767374932aafbad43539978a53.couch/
data
name
fe58718fe13cd483f4c66fb4b2c512b1.couch/
data
name
views/ <-- views go in here
b84dd25a153afb4a7412ab9c20413210.view/
data
name
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchris.mfdz.com
