On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 28 Dec 2008, at 14:32, Antony Blakey wrote: > >> >> On 28/12/2008, at 11:56 PM, Paul Davis wrote: >> >>> Why "id" and "rev" are used instead of "_id" and >>> "_rev" I couldn't really tell you. I hate to say "historical reasons" >>> but I'm guessing that when Damien designed the view output he just >>> labeled then "id" and "rev" without the underscore because it's not >>> needed to distinguish from the rest of the doc. >> >> Desirable to change that (and any other inconsistencies) before a 1.0 > > This keeps coming up and I've been advocating this for a while now: > > +1 for changing view result rows `rev` to `_rev` to avoid confusion. >
+1 too. Consistency FTW > CC'ing [email protected]. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > >
