Begin forwarded message:
Gentlemen,
I'm really hanging out on this issue. So far Damien has said that
the transactional group-operation is definitely being removed,
whilst Chris has said absolutely that no decision has been made.
This has serious implications for me, because my code assumes a
transactional _bulk_docs implementation.
If it's being left as is, or simply being renamed, then I can move
forward. If it's being removed, then I'm going to have to maintain a
private fork, because I presume that a decision to remove it rather
than rename it means that you wouldn't accept a patch that simply
adds that code under a different name (otherwise, why remove it when
you could just rename it?).
Having to maintain a private fork has other serious implications for
me.
Is there some other way I need to approach this to get a resolution?
Thanks,
Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Borrow money from pessimists - they don't expect it back.
-- Steven Wright
