Re: proposed replication rev history changes

[Adam Kocoloski]

Hi Damien, it seems to me that you're conflating two separate issues.   
I agree that the revision history should be trimmed, and that this  
will potentially introduce spurious conflicts when two servers have no  
shared history for a document.  I don't see how this change by itself  
requires the addition of a revseq to the JSON revision format.  Is it  
really required?

Adam