On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]> wrote: > The one caveat with EUnit is that it is released under the LGPL. > I am not a lawyer but the consensus on "The Net" is that writing > test-cases against the EUnit API and conditionally including > eunit.hrl to include the API does not mean that the test code itself > must be released under the terms of the LGPL. If anyone is > familiar with this, can you comment on whether this is correct?
Best for you would be to send a question to [email protected]. With my conservative hat on, I'm a bit concerned about LGPL virality in namespaced languages, and most definitely concerned with distribution of EUnit itself (I reckon this is not necessary as EUnit is part of OTP now?). -- Gianugo Rabellino Sourcesense, making sense of Open Source: http://www.sourcesense.com (blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)
