On 16 Feb 2009, at 03:01, Damien Katz wrote:
This might not cause problems for us, but what about downstream
projects?
What exactly do you have in mind? I think the patch and
my legal understanding* of this is that the addition of EUnit
tests is unobtrusive:
- EUnit tests are not required to run to build or install CouchDB.
- If a downstream project can't provide EUnit for whatever reason,
they can't run our unit tests.
- We continue to ship pure Apache 2.0 licensed code.
Cheers
Jan
--
* See my last mail.
-Damien
On Feb 15, 2009, at 8:32 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Gianugo Rabellino
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
I prepared a patch that adds EUnit-style tests to CouchDB:
[...]
What do you think?
I hate to rain on anyone's parade, especially when work and
dedication
are involved, but is everyone fine with the potential licensing
issues
in adopting the LGPL'd EUnit module?
I figure it's just like using any other standard library, but I
really
don't have the expertise on this matter.
--
Chris Anderson
http://jchris.mfdz.com
