On 24/02/2009, at 1:00 PM, Damien Katz wrote:
I think if we change from _rev to something else, _cc for
concurrency control is good. I'm not sure this is necessary.
Concurrency control describes how it got there, but it's not the thing
itself e.g. it's not 'the concurrency control' it's an artifact of a
concurrency control mechanism. It would be good to have the name of
the thing describe it accurately.
I vote for this staying as is and being handled in the documentation,
where it belongs. The API doesn't approach a descriptive semantics.
Antony Blakey
-------------
CTO, Linkuistics Pty Ltd
Ph: 0438 840 787
Did you hear about the Buddhist who refused Novocain during a root
canal?
His goal: transcend dental medication.
