I meant to say Jan. Sorry about that Jan, Bob
On Feb 26, 2009, at 7:08 AM, Robert Dionne wrote:
Patrick,
I think an meant to say *would*. Views only run within a database.
Cheers,
Bob
On Feb 26, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Patrick Antivackis wrote:
And ?
Once it has runned once, it just takes into account the new docs
2009/2/26 Jan Lehnardt <[email protected]>
On 26 Feb 2009, at 12:42, Patrick Antivackis wrote:
That would certainly lower the number of require requests. I
thought
for a minute about using a temp_view for this, but there is no
way to
restrict them to run on only the design docs, so the overhead
could be
tremendous. I still think it'd be trivial to implement as part
of a
view-like response from /db/_design/
Why don't you just create a view looking in _design/docs that
have either
an
_attachment like index.html or if the couchapp.index field exist ?
Because a view needs to run through all documents in all databases.
Cheers
Jan
--