On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Chris Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Christopher Lenz <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 25.02.2009, at 06:16, Chris Anderson wrote: >>> >>> The question raised by all of this is how closely do we want CouchDB >>> to be intertwined with CouchApp? >> >> In my opinion we should go out of our way to avoid the >> impression that CouchApps are the preferred/endorsed way to use CouchDB. > > Definitely agree with you here, and I've felt this way for a while - > thanks for putting the Futon links in this perspective.
I've removed the Applications column from Futon. The index of CouchApps could even be it's own CouchApp, so integration questions can wait indefinitely. I'd like to push the httpd_design_handlers stuff into trunk so it can start to get more eyes before we tag a release. Changing the names of _show and _list is trivial with this architecture, so I think we can commit this change without closing that discussion. I think it will be helpful to give the _view url change a soft landing, so libraries and stuff can get used to it before the 0.9.0 release. Anyway, I won't commit until we've had a little more time for comments. Cheers, Chris -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com
