>>> Hence, I propose to remove the MOVE feature. >> >> I had the impression that at some point MOVE would also (atomically) >> move the underlying .view files if applied to a design doc. Such a >> feature would be very useful for upgrading clients. >> >> Am I wrong, or was there ever such a proposal? > > There was an idea. There's an alternative idea (hashing view index > filenames by view-function code) that looks more feasible in > general and doesn't rely on MOVE. If we were to go with moving > the view files, COPY & DELETE will work, too.
Fine so. Consider my tentative objection retracted. Paul
