On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:57:43PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > That said, what keeps us from 0.10? I did contemplate the the jump from > 0.9 isn't as big as the jump from 0.8. Though, I would probably say that > the jump from 0.8 to 0.9 was fairly delayed. At the moment there are at > least three new features: config.d updates, bulk=ok, and the reduce > warnings; none of which seem like only a $(REVISON) change. To me that > doesn't seem like something to ignore but I would be perfectly happy > referring to version numbers via subversion revision so I'm a bit not > normal on that front.
Just to be clear, my configuration changes were not merged back. What changes, specifically, do you think should be pulled from the 0.9.x branch? -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
